Turno Libre

Pepe Mujica spoke after the ruling against the Uruguayan State

Pepe Mujica spoke after the ruling against the Uruguayan State

Publicado: 16/02/2024

Pepe Mujica spoke after the ruling against the Uruguayan State

<p>Former President Jos&eacute; Mujica, in recent statements, reflected on the legal outcome against the Uruguayan State linked to the Pluna airline, emphasizing that the company&#39;s situation was unsustainable long before its liquidation in 2012, during his term. Mujica described Pluna as an entity that &quot;had been dead for a decade,&quot; highlighting the difficulties deepened by the alliance with Brazilian airline Varig and subsequent decisions that he said only made the situation worse.</p>

<p>The verdict, which resonates in the country&#39;s political and economic sphere, has revived the debate on the decisions and policies taken by successive governments regarding the management of state-owned enterprises and their impact on the national economy. Mujica, addressing the issue, acknowledged the government&#39;s responsibility in the course of events that led to the closure of the airline, pointing out in turn the complexity of the matter and the final result as a &quot;loss of value for the Uruguayan people.&quot;</p>

<p>This loss, according to the former president, contrasts painfully with other situations in which state interventions, such as the recapitalization of the Mortgage Bank, implied significant costs for the public treasury but entailed redistributions of benefits at the national level. The liquidation of Pluna, on the other hand, is perceived as a net loss, with no return for Uruguayan society, which accentuates Mujica&#39;s regret in the face of this outcome.</p>

<p>M&aacute;s all&aacute; de la cr&iacute;tica situaci&oacute;n espec&iacute;fica de Pluna, Mujica aprovech&oacute; para plantear una reflexi&oacute;n m&aacute;s amplia sobre la soberan&iacute;a legal y econ&oacute;mica de Am&eacute;rica Latina frente a las corporaciones transnacionales y la inversi&oacute;n extranjera. Hizo hincapi&eacute; en la necesidad de que las futuras generaciones latinoamericanas aspiren a una mayor autonom&iacute;a en el &aacute;mbito del derecho comercial internacional, sugiriendo la creaci&oacute;n de una corte de derecho regional que pueda mediar y tener jurisdicci&oacute;n sobre disputas involucrando a entidades extranjeras, de manera similar a lo que ya existe en materia de derechos humanos.</p>

<p>La propuesta de Mujica no solo busca mitigar las consecuencias adversas de la dependencia econ&oacute;mica y jur&iacute;dica de la regi&oacute;n respecto al &quot;mundo rico&quot;, sino que tambi&eacute;n apunta a establecer un marco legal que proteja los intereses nacionales y regionales frente a las din&aacute;micas globales de inversi&oacute;n y comercio. Estas declaraciones invitan a una reflexi&oacute;n sobre c&oacute;mo Uruguay, y por extensi&oacute;n Am&eacute;rica Latina, puede equilibrar la atracci&oacute;n de inversiones extranjeras con la protecci&oacute;n de sus intereses econ&oacute;micos y soberan&iacute;a jur&iacute;dica, una cuesti&oacute;n de relevancia cr&iacute;tica en el contexto de la globalizaci&oacute;n econ&oacute;mica y los desaf&iacute;os legales transfronterizos.</p>

← Volver al inicio